From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 15:49:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E1716A400 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C8113C484 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F8B51946; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:49:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 16:49:18 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070608164918.2cdc85cc@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <466926E6.3080703@gmail.com> References: <466926E6.3080703@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jackbarnett@gmail.com Subject: Re: Offtopic: x.org verus xFree86? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:49:22 -0000 On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 04:52:38 -0500 Jack Barnett wrote: > > This is slightly off topic... but anyone know the differences between > x.org and xFree86? > > I was using FreeBSD 4.xxx for the longest time (and some varieties of > Linux, OpenBSD, etc) and all where xFree86. > I was out of the "scene" for a bit (but still running 4.xxx) and > recently upgraded to 6.2 and it has x.org... > > x.org all over the place. > no more traces of xfree86 anywhere! As I understand it there was an argument about the way things were being run in the project, so many of the developers left to run xorg the way they wanted. Virtually everyone went with xorg as it has a better licence and promised faster, more open development. The full story should be in Google somewhere.