Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:26:15 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How much of a risk is 5.x ... ? Message-ID: <87n038pzl4.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20040611151630.P909@ganymede.hub.org> (Marc G. Fournier's message of "Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:34:47 -0300 (ADT)") References: <20040611151630.P909@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-06-11T18:34:47Z, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > I'm just about to order in a new server, and with the 5-STABLE branch > being, more or less, just around the corner, was considering using this > new server to start migrating to 5.x ... I've been running 5.x on a production server for quite a few months now. The main reason is that I'm the main Unix guy at my job, and if I get hit by a bus it'll be far easier for my coworkers to upgrade from 5.2.something to 5-STABLE when it comes out than from 4-STABLE to 5-STABLE. I've had no problems whatsoever in a live environment. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAyyCX5sRg+Y0CpvERAv4hAKCECsVC5ymjVGRAh4l064xyuyXusQCgnOb/ g1+An2/+cke86GHIyyxbAyE= =6P1C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87n038pzl4.fsf>