From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 30 7:52:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.cybersurf.net (smtp1.cybersurf.net [209.197.145.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DFC37B400 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:52:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [209.197.155.113] ([209.197.155.113]) by smtp1.cybersurf.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id G4UHFM00.4GH; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:52:34 -0700 From: "Duke Normandin" <01031149@3web.net> To: mark.rowlands@minmail.net Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:27:18 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: ftp transfer rates on my LAN Reply-To: 01031149@3web.net Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.50 Message-Id: <20001130155237.48DFC37B400@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 30 Nov 00 at 6:51, Mark Rowlands wrote: >On Wednesday 29 November 2000 23:59, Duke Normandin wrote: >> I'm kinda like a monkey trying to copulate a football/soccer ball when it >> comes to my new toy --- my mickey-mouse 10baseT LAN ;,) >> >> Anyway..... ftped my first file from win95 to 3.3R box. I'm curious about >> the transfer rate that follows: >> >> 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for 'dr703.exe'. >> 226 Transfer complete. >> ftp: 6243908 bytes sent in 18.40Seconds 339.34Kbytes/sec. >> >> Is this an acceptable transfer rate? If it's not, is there anything that I >> can do with my existing hardware - 3c509 Compaq Netflex ? >> Would setting both to full duplex (if possible) help? Tia.... >> >> -duke >> Calgary,Alberta, Canada > >what a wonderful word picture you paint! this seems somewhat tardy tho. I call it like it is ;) What's tardy - the transfer rates, or my "word picture"? ;,) >I get 1100 kb/s from win9x -> freebsd over 10mbs with 5mb+ executables using >the command line ftp client running in half duplex. You could try ensuring 1100 kb/s = 1.1Mbps. Unless my math is wrong, this is not great either when 10BaseT with Cat5 can do 4-10Mbps according to the books I've got here on my desk. Of course, your rate is a heck of a lot better than mine. >that whatever you select, both machines are set to the same settings. No >autoselect/hardware default nonsense. I would also check you have installed I assume you mean the NIC settings on both machines? >the myriad of patches available for win95 and it's tcp/ip stack My ISP's required BS software needed winsock2 - an enhanced version I gather. I didn't realize that they might have enhanced the "enhanced". I'll check into that as well. Thanks... -duke Calgary,Alberta, Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message