Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:42:51 +0200
From:      Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr>
To:        Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/64948: [NEW PORT] textproc/xmlpull: Common API for XML Pull Parsing (XmlPull)
Message-ID:  <20040401144251.GA88365@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200404011329.i31DTIGo054334@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200404011329.i31DTIGo054334@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:29:18AM -0800, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Please be patient, there are literally hundreds of new ports
> waiting here and our manpower is limited..

No problem with that. The Dom4J port has been on my personal TODO list
for months now, so it's not like I'm in a hurry ;)

> Anyway, this does not build. Smells like a missed dependency
> on ant.
> 
> ===>  Building for xmlpull-1.1.3.4a
> /usr/local/bin/ant: not found
> *** Error code 127

I tried to re-use some parts of the Makefiles from existing ports I
maintain. Unfortunately, some of them are binary ones, and thus do not
require Ant to build obviously...

Here comes a new port as attachement.

Herve

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040401144251.GA88365>