From owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 12:15:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E906437B401 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.turbonet.com (mail.turbonet.com [206.228.112.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9E343F3F for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:15:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrewr@uidaho.edu) Received: from halogen ([63.161.23.23]) by mail.turbonet.com (Merak 5.9.4) with ESMTP id MZV74099 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 12:12:55 -0700 From: Andrew Robinson Organization: University of Idaho To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:16:19 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306031216.19062.andrewr@uidaho.edu> Subject: cvsup and portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Gathering place for new users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:15:23 -0000 Hi all, I'm confused about the connection between cvsup and portupgrade. When I run portupgrade, it seems to ftp the code to my machine from a remote server. But, I was under the impression that I was maintaining an up-to-date copy of the source code via regular use of cvsup and the example code in the ports-supfile. Can anyone clarify for me? What would happen if I ignored cvsup altogether? Thanks! Andrew -- Andrew Robinson Ph: 208 885 7115 Department of Forest Resources Fa: 208 885 6226 University of Idaho E : andrewr@uidaho.edu PO Box 441133 W : http://www.uidaho.edu/~andrewr Moscow ID 83843 Or: http://www.biometrics.uidaho.edu No statement above necessarily represents my employer's opinion.