From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 01:28:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA289106566B; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 01:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC228FC0A; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 01:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p991Stgr010551; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:28:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p991Std1010548; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:28:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:28:55 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matt Thyer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20111008155252.GA24223.edited@vs2.gothschlampen.com> <4E90B4B1.7000009@FreeBSD.org> <4E90C801.4060108@FreeBSD.org> <4E90EBF5.4090101@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:28:55 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Garrett Cooper , Glen Barber , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Thomas K." , Nathan Whitehorn Subject: Re: Memstick image differences between 8.x and 9.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 01:28:56 -0000 On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote: > On Oct 9, 2011 11:04 AM, "Nathan Whitehorn" wrote: > > > > On 10/08/11 19:25, Matt Thyer wrote: > >> > > > There is also the interesting question of actually installing to GPT on the hard disk, which is the default in 9.0. Does this not work on some systems? If so, do we want to blacklist > them and use a different default partition scheme? Can we identify systems that violate regular PC boot standards and reject GPT? Any data on any of these points would be appreciated. > > > I don't think there have been any reports of failure to boot properly formatted GPT yet. Lenovo T420S and T520, from the links above. Install GPT on the hard drive, try to boot. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=26304 http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=26759 http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=98078