From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Oct  5 19:13:44 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0BC8737B401; Sat,  5 Oct 2002 19:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BD5D143E65; Sat,  5 Oct 2002 19:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9C2022A88D; Sat,  5 Oct 2002 19:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>,
	"Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	German Tischler <tanis@gaspode.franken.de>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Jonathan Mini <mini@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: SSE 
In-Reply-To: <15775.21658.385069.581909@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> 
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 19:13:42 -0700
From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Message-Id: <20021006021342.9C2022A88D@canning.wemm.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> 
> Daniel Eischen writes:
>  > > > On further reflection, this DEFINITELY has to do with the work done on
     
>  > > > npx(4)/signals/etc. in the past week.  I _must_ be getting a GPF becau
    se the 
>  > > > fpu state that it's attempting to restore is corrupt (i.e.: the contro
    l word 
>  > > > is incorrect), so something is not being initialized somewhere that it
     used 
>  > > > to be, or is being initialized incorrectly.
>  > > 
>  > > The last few commits to machdep.c bother me, rev 1.539 in particular.
>  > > 
>  > > If you are in a position to be able to quickly test it, it would be grea
    t
>  > > to know if backing out the last few changes fixes this, and which change
     in
>  > > particular.
>  > 
>  > There have been two commits since 1.539; what version of machdep.c
>  > is being used?
> 
> 1.539 works.  1.540 crashes.  The failure mode is:

My apologies, I meant 1.540 (really :-).

I suspect it might be time to give up and do the alternative sigtrap and
sigreturn.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message