From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 27 21:00:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3324B16A41F for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4689343D5C for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:00:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7RL0eYd018828 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:00:40 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7RL0eAZ018825; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:00:40 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:00:40 GMT Message-Id: <200508272100.j7RL0eAZ018825@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Subject: Re: docs/85356: [patch] Make it clear that the extention name of the module isn't needed with kldload(8). X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:00:42 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/85356; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Julien Gabel Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/85356: [patch] Make it clear that the extention name of the module isn't needed with kldload(8). Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:55:26 +0300 On 2005-08-27 19:43, Julien Gabel wrote: > --- /usr/src/sbin/kldload/kldload.8 Mon Mar 3 23:48:06 2003 > +++ /tmp/kldload.8 Sat Aug 27 19:31:22 2005 > @@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ > into the kernel using the kernel linker. > Note that if multiple modules are specified then an attempt will > be made to load them all, even if some fail. > +The > +.Pa .ko > +extension name is not yet mandatory when loading a given module > +using > +.Nm . > +It doesn't hurt to keep it though. Not ``yet''? You mean there are plans to make it mandatory? > -Some modules (ipfw, ipf, etc.) may be automatically loaded at boot > -time by having their operation enabled in > +Some modules (lomac, pf, ipfw, ipf, etc.) may be automatically loaded > +at boot time by having their operation enabled in > .Xr rc.conf 5 . The word ``operation'' is not very nice here. Modules may be required for some ``feature'' but they don't ``operate'' on anything.