From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 16 08:53:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1D416A535 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73CE13C481 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:53:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id l1G8rFh01153; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:53:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <000601c751a7$b330b310$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Steven H. Baeighkley" , References: <45D3A4D7.9000504@frii.com><00ff01c7510e$7452e490$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <012a01c75128$4d3a5a40$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <45D49D5A.8070800@frii.com> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:51:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: Subject: Re: **questions** Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:53:19 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven H. Baeighkley" To: Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:50 AM Subject: Re: **questions** Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release > If bugs is the correct list then that's where we'll send it. However we > were not initially thinking it was a bug. We were thinking it was a > configuration error on our part. We certainly weren't expecting kernel > patches, just advice on where next to proceed. Thanks for the send-pr > suggestion. We have verbose dmesg logs for all of our testing, I didn't > want to send them initially because they are large and we have 12 of them. > If you have 4 CPU's and FreeBSD is only seeing 2 of them then I'd say it's a bug! You can always post a link to where the logs are. Ted