From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Jul 13 09:56:28 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D051031AEB for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: from kanar.ci0.org (kanar.ci0.org [IPv6:2001:bc8:35e6::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "sd-123398", Issuer "sd-123398" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551477DBEF for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: from kanar.ci0.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanar.ci0.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6D9uLcI060348 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:56:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by kanar.ci0.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w6D9uGqT060347; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:56:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:56:16 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard To: Warner Losh Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Retiring two more: Atmel and Xscale Message-ID: <20180713095616.GA60331@ci0.org> References: <201807122111.w6CLBjP2080376@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:56:29 -0000 Hi, On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 03:54:09PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Rodney W. Grimes < > freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > I'd like to retire Atmel and Xscale support prior to 12. The atmel stuff > > > has been dodgy for a long time and generally lacks the memory to run > > > FreeBSD well. We have no current users of it. > > > > > > The Xscale stuff is old enough to not be relevant. There's no known > > users. > > > Part of it is already set to go with the big endian stuff, but is there a > > > reason to keep the rest? > > > > I thought a depreciation policy was in process to help deal with > > all of these. > > > > It will, but these two are no-brainers. The last known users of both of > these sub-ports are done with them (Atmel since 8.2, Xscale maybe longer). > The one Atmel product I'm aware of will never upgrade past 8.2. The Xscale > stuff has not been used even longer in any serious way (since the 7 > timeframe, though there were one or two possible single users). > > If there's no objections, I'll just remove. If there are objections, it > will be easy enough to do under that umbrella. > I think I'm the last known Xscale "user", and I would be more than glad to see it gone :) Regards, Olivier