From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 03:03:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD29916A41F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:03:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85A5A43D5E for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:03:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2005 03:03:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi25-1.glh.mhn.de) [129.187.43.241] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 24 Nov 2005 04:03:15 +0100 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi25-1.glh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97A8DC17C; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 04:03:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 04:03:17 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: Thomas-Martin Seck Message-ID: <20051124030317.GA99949@zi25-1.glh.mhn.de> References: <200511232220.jANMKPTe022341@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200511232220.jANMKPTe022341@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, rauf@kuliev.com Subject: Re: ports/89329: Add WCCPv2 support to www/squid X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:03:18 -0000 Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/89329; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Thomas-Martin Seck > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Cc: rauf@kuliev.com > Subject: Re: ports/89329: Add WCCPv2 support to www/squid > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:17:35 +0100 > > * Edwin Groothuis (edwin@FreeBSD.org): > > I'm sorry, I cannot approve this patch. [ ... ] Without knowing the details of the specifc port: If the upstream authors don't want to integrate the work (which certainly was the best option), the submitter of the patch also could create a slave port and maintain it (unless the maintainer of the main port severly objects, of course). Just my EUR 0.02, -- Best regards / Viele Grüße, barner@FreeBSD.org Simon Barner barner@gmx.de