From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  5 09:45:14 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213331065670
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2008 09:45:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nlcom_os@ii.nl)
Received: from mail1.ii.nl (mail1.ii.nl [82.94.191.120])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28838FC18
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2008 09:45:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nlcom_os@ii.nl)
Received: from c53751d89.cable.wanadoo.nl ([83.117.29.137]:58584
	helo=[192.168.1.103])
	by mail1.ii.nl with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	authenticated as nanno with plain authenticator (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <nlcom_os@ii.nl>)
	id 1K4C0d-0006WE-I7; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:43:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4847B552.9070807@ii.nl>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:43:46 +0200
From: Nanno Langstraat <nlcom_os@ii.nl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
References: <4847182F.80105@ii.nl> <200806050119.24405.max@love2party.net>
In-Reply-To: <200806050119.24405.max@love2party.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Standard byteorder functions across BSD / Linux
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:45:14 -0000

Max Laier wrote:
> On Thursday 05 June 2008 00:33:19 Nanno Langstraat wrote:
>   
>>     * <endian.h> or <sys/endian.h> ?
>>       I maintain that it should be <endian.h> for user applications:
>>       IMHO <sys/> is for the user-kernel API, and byteorder belongs to
>>       libc not the kernel API.
>>       glibc apparently agrees, OpenBSD disagreed.
>>     
>
> Not sure about this.  There might be namespace issues with this approach, 
> though there probably shouldn't.

True. However, glibc (i.e. Linux) has had the file <endian.h> for a long
time.  (That's probably why Ulrich Drepper simply added the new macros
there)

Since they're something of an "800 pound gorilla", I don't think it'll
be an additional hazard for BSD to add that file to the top-level file
namespace.

In fact, glibc are taking an extra risk, because their pre-existing
<endian.h> is automatically pulled in by common things like <ctype.h>
and <pthread.h>.

On FreeBSD, a newly introduced <endian.h> can sit there innocently, and
only be pulled in by user applications that explicitly know about it.


> It's obviously not a problem to have 
> both, but getting rid of sys/endian.h now is too late for sure.
>   

Agree, won't disappear, even if only because the kernel uses it.

    Nanno