From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 9 16:10:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B744573; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [8.8.178.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7D78FC0A; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q99GACZ8031999; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:10:12 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q99GABV7031998; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:10:11 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:10:09 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: svn commit: r305288 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20121009161009.GF8713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org> <20121005202842.GA64496@FreeBSD.org> <20121006080539.GB30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5070A018.9010302@FreeBSD.org> <20121008035621.GA91369@FreeBSD.org> <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121009155946.GA70759@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WlEyl6ow+jlIgNUh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121009155946.GA70759@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:10:12 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:10:12 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:10:12 -0000 --WlEyl6ow+jlIgNUh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:59:46PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:12:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:56:21AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > That's because OptionsNG poorly implement mutually exclusive options.= I > > > hope that eventually dialog's --radiolist would be utilized for proper > > > handling, and sane knobs names would be restored. > > >=20 > > > Sounds like a nice port junior hacker project. > >=20 > > Not hat junior dialog(1) can't mix radiolist and classic checklist that= is > > why it doesn't use it, using libdialog(3), it would be easiy to impleme= nt, > > but that won't be usable for a while (until all supported version of > > freebsd has it. >=20 > Ah, OK, that explains it (lack of radiobuttons now). Is it known what's > preventing all supported versions to have working libdialog(3), if we have > working dialog(1) already? >=20 > ./danfe new dialog is only on 9.x and 10.x, if will require to code some special dialog(1) dedicated for ports, MFCing libdialog to 8 and 7 is complicated because the API isn't compatible. regards, Bapt --WlEyl6ow+jlIgNUh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlB0TGEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyvpwCfbQQST7/3AMVG0+NDF155nqY6 eY8An1L/rj15/L6nAyPYSKuaYscQiEUk =aa9D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WlEyl6ow+jlIgNUh--