From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Sep  1 20:39:32 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC41914FDA
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  1 Sep 1999 20:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id XAA08451;
	Wed, 1 Sep 1999 23:39:28 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 23:39:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199909020339.XAA08451@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FW: Local DoS in FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990901191051.04e80570@granite.sentex.ca>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909012215420.7489-100000@heidi.plazza.it>
	<Pine.BSF.4.10.9909011409520.19266-100000@free-bsd.org>
	<199909012046.QAA07324@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
	<4.1.19990901191051.04e80570@granite.sentex.ca>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Wed, 01 Sep 1999 19:11:51 -0400, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> said:


> Do you think these changes would be incorporated into the 3.x branch, or
> strictly 4.x ?

By the time the work actually gets done, 3.x will be history.  Like I
said, it's hard.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message