From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  4 12:09:05 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6913016A4CE; Mon,  4 Apr 2005 12:09:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A863F43D5A; Mon,  4 Apr 2005 12:09:04 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j34C8uf1000958;
	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:08:56 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:20:25 CDT."
             <20050404011948.P33953@odysseus.silby.com> 
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:08:56 +0200
Message-ID: <957.1112616536@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vnode_pager.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:09:05 -0000

In message <20050404011948.P33953@odysseus.silby.com>, Mike Silbersack writes:

>Some of us have less time to devote to FreeBSD than we'd like these days, 
>so let's make it fair.  Calculate pointy hats per commit rather than just 
>the aggregate count of hats. :)

Absolutely no way.  We all know what this kind of innocent proposal
leads to: sports-statistics:

	"This week we saw JeffR improve on his 0.3424 commit rate
	but it came at the cost of a 0.00213 increase in his
	pointy-hat-quotient, this brings the total average for the
	VFS team up to 0.00243 because PHK suffered a setback
	yesterday and therefore now the ACPI team leads the league
	with a 0.00015 margin to the VFS team.  The VFS team still
	holds a solid lead 0.732 lead over ACPI on architecture."

We just don't want to go there, see ?

:-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.