From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 26 16:42:52 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA07989 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:42:52 -0700 Received: from chemserv.umd.edu (chemserv.umd.edu [129.2.64.40]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA07977 ; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:42:48 -0700 Received: from espresso.eng.umd.edu (espresso.eng.umd.edu [129.2.98.13]) by chemserv.umd.edu (8.7.Beta.14/8.7.Beta.14) with ESMTP id TAA21375; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 19:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: (chuckr@localhost) by espresso.eng.umd.edu (8.7/8.6.4) id TAA12458; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 19:42:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 19:41:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey To: Julian Elischer cc: Terry Lambert , jkh@time.cdrom.com, richard@harlequin.co.uk, freebsd-install@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Installation" and "upgrade" In-Reply-To: <199509262258.PAA10812@ref.tfs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 26 Sep 1995, Julian Elischer wrote: > but an old fs is stil a valid fs under the new scheme! I'm not arguing that for a second, Julian, but is this good advice to give to someone asking questions on -questions? That's the only thing I'm addressing. > > > > In addition to these changes, the FS in 386BSD did not support the clean > > flag, and the current and immediately previous FS does. > > > > So the FS /has/ changed somewhat. > > > > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------