From owner-freebsd-net  Thu Aug 31 14: 3:23 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from gizmo.csl.sony.co.jp (dhcp181.sigcomm.sics.se [212.181.55.181])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4B937B42C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gizmo.csl.sony.co.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA05532;
	Fri, 1 Sep 2000 06:01:34 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from kjc@csl.sony.co.jp)
To: akorud@polynet.lviv.ua
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ALTQ integration?
From: Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <8630326.20000831203057@polynet.lviv.ua>
References: <8630326.20000831203057@polynet.lviv.ua>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20000901060134N.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 06:01:34 +0900
X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130)
Lines: 29
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Andriy Korud wrote:
> Is ALTQ integrated into FreeBSD4-STABLE?

not yet.

> If no, is there exist some branch?

not in the FreeBSD tree.

> If no, will ALTQ 2.2 apply to 4-STABLE or 4.1-RELEASE?

altq-2.2 supports only 4.0.

> Will there be any difference between KAME source tree and integrated
> ALTQ?

The latest KAME snap supports 4.1 and has altq-3.0a that is still
under development.

> And last:
> If I need production router with ALTQ on dc and sppp interfaces on the
> next week, which is the best solution?

You have 2 choices:
 - FreeBSD-4.0R + altq-2.2
 - FreeBSD-4.1R + KAME snap

-Kenjiro


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message