From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 25 03:46:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA171065675 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fender0107401@gmail.com) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5C68FC14 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fender0107401@gmail.com) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a1so2142181tib.3 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:46:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=X9d/xqcLyDU61mJ7uivrPCGJKAYy2DW8cSLubX4GZNs=; b=TzdmjaX0nd66j3SIWUg297px+DKCX5WqWUABgHGs1/cKPj2+g2d1BfP80Ij+g8JtrA PMS0Xt1voBShwjQyQJKYZhUb+QrTMeXuilCqCboiVsYzUwQLDZ6KLdt4QsS/ASjHH80J ASeloFEGjAjjp45+LwlTuhAoRk74RXV77g3ds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=qiCT89Xk95W5+7Fu3rnv5jKk+etnJcG6dK6Np+gHpINf27Z8NaAiTy4S06mlDX06or OuFyqCqMIXWc+nVfy6InUph34lDmlew+VPL0j/McQZXzVqxIpzQhKKolGgF2LuwQNaL0 IcWbVneG930w/YUcBXgJtvl7fSCQi3E9LMjMs= Received: by 10.110.105.5 with SMTP id d5mr9725049tic.47.1230175134177; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.250? ([219.243.32.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a4sm2694696tib.27.2008.12.24.19.18.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:18:53 -0800 (PST) From: Li To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ESmX2xmbfUfO9pR22Tmz" Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:18:46 +0800 Message-Id: <1230175126.1189.26.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: Subject: A question about update(I think it should be added to our faq). X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:46:41 -0000 --=-ESmX2xmbfUfO9pR22Tmz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I have a question about the base_system update, I have not found it in the handbook or faq, and someone have asked it several times in www.chinaunix.net freebsd forum.=20 Someone told me yes in freebsd official forum:http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D1078 The question is: If I update system from release_6.1 to release_7.0, whether I should re-compile every ports use the "portupgrade -af" command. Somebody told me "yes", "no" or "recommendatory", but they have not give me any explanation, so I am confused about it. Yesterday I asked it again in irc.freenode.net #bsdchat, somebody told me "yes" and give me a explanation. It is difficult to understand for me, something he said. But think he is right. I think it is a good question, we should add it to our faq or the handbook. fender --=20 Debian GNU/Linux + FreeBSD --=-ESmX2xmbfUfO9pR22Tmz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAklS+5YACgkQmVapie7+cWwbZACcDQgbo6DPBg2PNmj79pKd5rn9 1t4An2DH+lMMUIUPiUUeZk69YSbpv9gQ =zUOc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ESmX2xmbfUfO9pR22Tmz--