From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 10:44:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0471BC9E090 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77AA174C for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v05AiJb7066316 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:44:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: Jan Bramkamp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <4c8d3ad3-156d-e5a4-0051-9b6e590530ce@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 18:44:14 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:44:25 -0000 On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote: > On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install >> both samba44 >> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? >> Or samba44 and KDE? >> >> If yes, then that sucks... similar happened recently with the two jpeg libraries. They can't be installed at the same time but some packages wanted one and some the other. > > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and > set the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With > binary packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no > longer see removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to > justify the complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build > time to disable this dependency (e.g. a bad security track > record/process, different licenses)? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >