From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 19:44:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C099216A425 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:44:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E23843D48 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:44:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so229988wri for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:44:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SLgDUwow/E07I7omotDiKAklUwMJ2uTBCSZN5v6bpR5oIyLA54Kn/I0PEjBjZadpv4mhBHKTQsDQwMUyWAJAKE0x1Nu7rKXY1GYm9pJUti6AK2Vncl7izrPJtahF5aq9BwwLJcmW2ollqMsIEQt/5o5u9rIBfuJKfSYAxy6hod0= Received: by 10.54.136.15 with SMTP id j15mr581380wrd; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 23:44:06 +0400 From: Dmitry Mityugov To: "scuba@centroin.com.br" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mismatch results with disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Mityugov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:44:07 -0000 On 6/9/05, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > No one else has seem this? > I upgraded to 5.4 and the problem was kept. > Should it be a problem with ICH5 driver? >=20 >=20 > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: Please bear with me, I just can't figure out what the original problem was. Was it that any IDE HDD attached to the 2ndary IDE controller always works very slow? Or was it that an IDE HDD attached as slave always works very slow? I can try to reproduce this on weekend, I just need to understand what should I look for. --=20 Dmitry "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E"