From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Mon Jul 20 16:34:01 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901359A6A77
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org)
Received: from pmta2.delivery6.ore.mailhop.org
 (pmta2.delivery6.ore.mailhop.org [54.200.129.228])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DD74127E
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org)
Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [73.34.117.227])
 by outbound2.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA;
 Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240])
 by ilsoft.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6KGXseh003414;
 Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:33:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <1437410034.1334.415.camel@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [Differential] [Updated] D3121: Don't allow malloc() to wait
 for resource while holding a lock in ITS
From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
Cc: Zbigniew Bodek <zbb@semihalf.com>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org"
 <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, phabric-admin@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:33:54 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20150720160835.GW8523@funkthat.com>
References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-ztsg4nogc7wzfzawsctm-req@FreeBSD.org>
 <2b488f78c7cd7f840f16f376dbb3408a@localhost.localdomain>
 <55A978B8.6080008@m5p.com>
 <CAF6rxgnzR8oPa0mQfAmp_Rqwb7uYKBOBPLx0Ov_gaD1y3XYKzw@mail.gmail.com>
 <55AA3D5D.5070907@m5p.com>
 <CAG7dG+xSuYK88kje_Gy-KMQhmuRY5ANZe=TZRvEH9fqp0PkfPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150720160835.GW8523@funkthat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:34:01 -0000

On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:08 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Zbigniew Bodek wrote this message on Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:27 +0200:
> > Just to clarify. You don't want to receive any e-mails from
> > Phabricator on freebsd-arm@ or just those redundant like "(...)
> > created a dependency"?
> 
> Mailing lists should never received subscriber added messages..
> They are a complete waste of traffic...
> 
> IMO, the only updates the mailing list should receive are created
> and diff uploaded...
> 
> Some could argue that the comments should be too, but IMO, if you care
> about the review, you'll subscribe yourself, and the review has all
> the comments tied together...
> 
> Anything else should be not set... and this applies to ALL mailing
> lists...

I'm not sure ANY review emails should get sent to this list.  But if
they are, IMO, it should only be "new review created" emails, nothing
more, ever, even if someone specifically adds the list as a subscriber.
A single "announcement" per review (and likewise for bugs in bugzilla,
which I think we've got right now) allows interested parties to
subscribe themselves.

-- Ian