From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 21 11:28:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA02431 for current-outgoing; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 11:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA02418 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (disn3.cybercity.dk) by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA02527 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Mon, 21 Oct 1996 11:29:10 -0700 Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA03366; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 19:59:00 +0200 (MET DST) To: michael butler Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISDN code removal, final warning. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Oct 1996 03:46:28 +1000." <199610211746.DAA29279@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 19:59:00 +0200 Message-Id: <3364.845920740@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199610211746.DAA29279@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>, michael butler writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > >> I agree that putting all the Q931 in userland is a good idea, if nothing >> else, then for the developers of it. > >First up, I confess to not knowing much about ISDN at this level so my >question is likely naive at best .. does this layer have anything to do with >selecting the switch type ? The reason I ask is that we have a "standard" >(aka TS-013) which is almost totally unknown outside of Oz .. Yeah, Q.931 is the protocol that runs the show. As all other protocols from CCITT (now ITU-T) it has options by the boatloads and is so heavy that you reserve 128kbit/sec on a 2048kbut/sec circuit for it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.