From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 23 12:52:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB0E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:52:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6064443D39
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:52:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 12525 invoked by uid 1001); 23 Sep 2004 12:52:33 -0000
To: juhasaarinen@gmail.com
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:45:55 +1200"
References: <b34be84204092304456066b0a0@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:52:33 +0200
Message-ID: <12523.1095943953@bizet.nethelp.no>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Could ARG_MAX be increased?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:52:35 -0000

> Is there a reason for keeping ARG_MAX so low, or could it be increased
> to eg. 262,144 bytes?

Yes please! I've wanted this for a long time.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no