From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 3 01:08:33 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA29681 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 01:08:33 -0700 Received: from campino.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.225.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id BAA29661 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 01:08:22 -0700 Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de by campino.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (4.1/campino-6) id AA02023; Mon, 3 Apr 95 10:07:58 +0200 Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.8/8.6.9) id KAA23103 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 10:13:26 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 10:13:26 +0200 From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" Message-Id: <199504030813.KAA23103@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: BSD 'trade mark' Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan and other FreeBSD-Incers, under glass hung at my offices walls I have some snipped out articles from CTR (Computer Technology Review) out of 1989 (or so) - didn't yet find the exact year on one of the articles. Anyway, one of them is headed: "DESPITE UNIX BENEFITS UNIFICATION IS STILL ELUSIVE" Nearly 50% of UNIX facilities differ from BSD to System V ^^^ -------------------- by Mark J. Hatch, Apollo Computer Inc. -------------------- In the same issue "Ritchie defends UNIX against its critics". Just FYI in the course of searching for examples of BSD mentioning as a 'non trademark' usage. Again, sorry that I can't find out the exact issue #/date since tha articles are cut out of the mag. --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de FreeBSD blues 2.1.0-Development FreeBSD 2.1.0-Development #0: Sat Apr 1 17:12:08 MET DST 1995 root@blues:/usr/src/sys/compile/BLUESGUS i386