From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 30 10:22:34 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE1716A4CE
	for <cvs-all@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:22:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BA7543FE9
	for <cvs-all@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:22:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 89210 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Oct 2003 18:22:33 -0000
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:22:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20031030102144.L89089@root.org>
References: <20031029.222828.133432192.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<3FA0A683.40108@freebsd.org><20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile
 acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:22:34 -0000

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
>             M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
> : The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design
> : decision for SMPng made a long time ago.  That's why there's no longer
> : a SMP kernel option.
>
> Actually, I'm smoking crack here.  Forget I said it.
>
> We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels.  Instead,
> modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them.

Whatever you smoke, the bounty is now up to $40, thanks to another donor.
Let's see some code!

-Nate