Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 15:01:08 -0800 From: perikillo <perikillo@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules Message-ID: <51d7a5160601011501n12b0e0eew53e5fc7f81e44e2c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060101162710.GA36756@holestein.holy.cow> References: <20051231130326.D699@nebuchadnezzar.my.domain> <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAWk27stpn1EeEJTAPYrt2mMKAAAAQAAAAwdhgE%2BtcR0uyTHk5CjnP2AEAAAAA@bloemgarten.demon.nl> <51d7a5160512311732j4407dfd7g13af541ebf578213@mail.gmail.com> <20060101162710.GA36756@holestein.holy.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/1/06, Parv <parv@pair.com> wrote:
> in message <51d7a5160512311732j4407dfd7g13af541ebf578213@mail.gmail.com>,
> wrote perikillo thusly...
> >
> > root#chmod +x /etc/rc.d/ipnat.rules
>
> Why did you need to add execute bit for the rules?
>
>
> - Parv
>
> --
>
>
Hi Parv.
No, the file name is ipnat.bug, i make one mistake here. The
rules continue on /etc. Happy New Year!!!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51d7a5160601011501n12b0e0eew53e5fc7f81e44e2c>