From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Dec 21 09:47:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA25263 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:47:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (sj-dsl-9-129-138.dspeed.net [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA25216 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:47:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA58477; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:46:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199812211746.JAA58477@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Brett Glass cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux closing the gap on Windows NT 8) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 21 Dec 1998 10:40:39 MST." <4.1.19981221103914.06bec740@mail.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:46:14 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It is excellent propaganda for PC Unix systems and I too stopped and ponder on BSDI being open source however I can see that for the intended audience BSDI can constitute Open Source compare to Microsoft 8) Cheers, Amancio > Yeah, but that article also displayed the author's ignorance: > He said BSDI was open source. Can we trust his stats? > > --Brett > > At 09:18 AM 12/21/98 -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > >Shipped units is less than actually install units ! > > > >http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2177618,00.html > > > > > > Cheers, > > Amancio > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message