From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Jul 24 23:12:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618A637B405; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:12:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: from hornet.unixfreak.org (hornet [63.198.170.140]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170603E32; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:12:45 -0700 (PDT) To: Nik Clayton Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remove doc/share/sgml/freebsd.dtd? In-Reply-To: <20010724184034.A24746@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>; from nik@freebsd.org on "Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:40:34 +0100" Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:12:45 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010725061245.170603E32@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Nik Clayton writes: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 04:55:14AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > Is there any reason not to remove doc/share/sgml/freebsd.dtd? This is > > our custom DTD for DocBook 3.1, which we no longer use, or install as > > part of the docproj port. > > Other people using the DTD? I'm not proposing to wipe it off the face of the earth, just `cvs rm` it. If somebody is using it, they're probably (hopefully) not referencing it inside the doc/ tree (i.e., they're not using /usr/doc/share/sgml/freebsd.dtd as the path). Those who need it can still get it. > Maybe turn it in to a port? A port for one file sounds like overkill. Besides, where would it be installed? I'm not strictly opposed, but perhaps just sticking the last version on a web page somewhere would suffice. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message