From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 08:45:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B045B16A4D1 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98CF43FDD for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:45:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB4GjWmp021598; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:45:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB4GjW1W021597; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:45:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:45:32 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20031204164532.GD15528@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <3FCF60CB.3090103@mail.ru> <20031204163929.GB85960@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oj4kGyHlBMXGt3Le" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031204163929.GB85960@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: rihad cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOCLEAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:45:44 -0000 --oj4kGyHlBMXGt3Le Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:39:29AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:28:59PM +0400, rihad wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Are there any known issues about setting NOCLEAN from make.conf? >=20 > No new ones - it remains an option that you should only set if you > know what you're doing, and if you encounter problems with it you need > to remove it and do a full build. Generally NOCLEAN is only safe to > do when rebuilding, not when upgrading. >=20 That's pretty much true. We often saw when the type of the object changes from file to directory or vice versa, and that does not make a stale .depend happy at all. Also, I sometimes see problems with -DNOCLEAN upgrades in OpenSSL, I suspect there might be some missing hardcoded dependencies in its makefiles; I have not looked into it yet. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --oj4kGyHlBMXGt3Le Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/z2SsUkv4P6juNwoRAuaTAJ0V5ZkPR91wf1tiwzVasxFICTYB6ACdFInA cnZwSgdikkG8a6xvDfMvrjA= =cbhZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oj4kGyHlBMXGt3Le--