From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 15 01:02:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA13578 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 15 Jul 1997 01:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sendero-ppp.i-connect.net (sendero-ppp.i-Connect.Net [206.190.143.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA13548 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 1997 01:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9365 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Jul 1997 08:02:10 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2-alpha [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199707141751.LAA02683@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 01:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Organization: Atlas Telecom From: Simon Shapiro To: Steve Passe Subject: RE: interrupt latency Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi Steve Passe; On 14-Jul-97 you wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone recommend a test suite/methodology for evaluating interrupt > latency? > I have some ideas for improving the (currently poor) int response of the > SMP > kernel, but need a way to determine if I am actually bettering things. > > -- > Steve Passe | powered by > smp@csn.net | Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD > > I have microtime calls in the DPT driver. If I understand it correctly, on a P6-200 I could have 200 times better resolution with access to the registers in the CPU. I see interrupt latency of 0-3us with UP, and about the same with SMP, but suspect the timers resolution at these low numbers. Will be glad to acomodate. Simon