From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 08:57:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB4516A4B3 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EC243F75 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:57:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from fortytwo ([68.109.49.234]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20030918155735.ILUI15705.lakemtao07.cox.net@fortytwo>; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:57:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:56:33 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Alastair G. Hogge" Message-Id: <20030918105633.491ca766.kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com> In-Reply-To: <200309182315.53572.agh@tpg.com.au> References: <200309182056.01076.agh@tpg.com.au> <3F69AACF.3070209@rtl.org> <200309182315.53572.agh@tpg.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Jason Stewart cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD graphic interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:57:36 -0000 On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:15:53 +1000 "Alastair G. Hogge" wrote: > > libsdl (http://www.libsdl.org/index.php) can write to the console, and > > also works with C++. > Yeah I'm aware of LibSDL and I was thinking of using it. But decided against > it because of the GLPL. If there's some similar with a BSD license that would > great. If not...how would I start a project like it? > > The reason I'm interested is because I want try and provide a different GUI > for installation. Just so newbies have the choice of sysinstall or > whatever... Actually LGPL would not be much of a problem. LGPL unlike GPL, does not require the project it is being used in to be GPL.