From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Sep 7 4:45:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B728037B401; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 04:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA17002; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:45:50 +1000 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:45:09 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Mike Smith Cc: Kris Kennaway , Alexander Langer , Jordan Hubbard , , , Subject: Re: libh src/ import In-Reply-To: <200109062256.f86MuDo03899@mass.dis.org> Message-ID: <20010907214019.P38516-100000@alphplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Mike Smith wrote: > FWIW, I think that putting libh in the base system is a Very Bad Idea. I agree (because it depends on GUI bloat). > It should be a port, like sysinstall should be a port. But there needs to be a some way of installing the system using only tools in the system. I normally use tar(1). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message