From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:07:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A627A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:07:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACD443D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:07:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd-incoma.mbrd.ru ([194.117.71.30] helo=[172.16.4.9]) by mail.ciam.ru with asmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1Bp4Ga-000KBw-Kj; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:07:44 +0400 Message-ID: <4104F40A.3090803@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:07:38 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Renato Botelho References: <747dc8f3040726035218d56033@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <747dc8f3040726035218d56033@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "proxy.ciam.ru", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Renato Botelho wrote: > ===> Patching for firebird-1.5.1 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for firebird-1.5.1 > I the patch is there: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/firebird: =?iso-8859-1?q?Don=B4t_apply_the_patch?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:07:46 -0000 Renato Botelho wrote: > ===> Patching for firebird-1.5.1 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for firebird-1.5.1 > I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. > > Like you can see, the patch is there: Fixed. Thanks. -- Sem.