From owner-freebsd-security Thu May 28 22:21:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA27697 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 22:21:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from wumpus.its.uow.edu.au (wumpus.its.uow.edu.au [130.130.68.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA27657 for ; Thu, 28 May 1998 22:21:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ncb05@uow.edu.au) Received: from banshee.cs.uow.edu.au (ncb05@banshee.cs.uow.edu.au [130.130.188.1]) by wumpus.its.uow.edu.au (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with SMTP id PAA04502 for ; Fri, 29 May 1998 15:20:53 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 15:20:52 +1000 (EST) From: Nicholas Charles Brawn X-Sender: ncb05@banshee.cs.uow.edu.au To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ipv6 network addresses Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Is there an equivalent rfc (to 1918) that covers what network addresses you can use for internal ipv6 networks? I know that it's not really worth worrying about at this stage, but it would be good to know regardless. :) This might be more for -hackers or -chat, but i thought that it would be appropriate given the current thread on ipv6 & ipsec implementations. Nick -- Email: ncb05@uow.edu.au - DE 30 33 D3 16 91 C8 8D A7 F8 70 03 B7 77 1A 2A http://rabble.uow.edu.au/~nick - public key available on request. Nicholas Brawn - Computer Science Undergraduate, University of Wollongong. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message