From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Jan 9 3:31:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from ducky.nz.freebsd.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC30437B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 03:31:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from wocker (wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99]) by ducky.nz.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA24507 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:31:11 +1300 (NZDT) Message-Id: <200101091131.AAA24507@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: The FreeBSD Diary / FreshPorts To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:31:10 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: any Linux distros which are not Open Source? Reply-To: dan@langille.org X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm involved in a thread on nz.comp and someone made this statement: "There are commercial forms of Linux that are not open source." That's a conflict of terms isn't it? Doesn't the GPL require that it be open source? thanks. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ FreshPorts - http://freshports.org/ NZ Broadband - http://unixathome.org/broadband/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message