From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Feb 14 23:05:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA16728
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 23:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA16721
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 23:05:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.3/nervosa.com.2) with SMTP id XAA00249; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 23:05:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 23:05:10 -0800 (PST)
From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
To: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
cc: FreeBSD-current <current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin 
In-Reply-To: <199602150549.VAA05414@precipice.shockwave.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960214230500.234B-100000@nervosa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Well in that case, the identd port needs to be update, ill email the 
maintainer, still wondering about the man pages though.
Also, what exactly do you mean by "standalone", in.telnetd could be 
classified as standalone, couldn't it?

Chris Layne,
coredump@nervosa.com.

On Wed, 14 Feb 1996, Paul Traina wrote:

> Yes, you're absolutely correct, UNLESS they are standalone daemons, in
> which case, sbin is correct (e.g. sendmail, inetd)
> 
>   From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
>   Subject: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin
>   Shouldn't local daemon's, i.e. identd, imapd, go into /usr/local/libexec 
>   rather than /usr/local/sbin? Also, shouldn't local man pages go into 
>   /usr/local/share/man? I'm just trying to establish some consistency.
>   
>   Chris Layne,
>   coredump@nervosa.com.
>   
>