From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:42:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1492B106566B; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gkontos.mail@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7028FC08; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so4634391iaz.13 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:42:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Qvlf6c5sL5Ek7wapLPuEF8S53A813392B4nskG2/LE8=; b=EVpb1rfPpmIlmWvd6WKdNQs/QcS/bxoyC/8oBpOB9NKumeRZF9ca62v4sB8ITHD8Xl YeVHQyZ9lTLpfVLgi24SwKFE0rAFZcdhERtvSMFmfB4CPqPKm8gRZO0atsRHx+zocBDQ f61QbjmCxnZLNgDKTU4KnrNvS2JlRnKbrsj1Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.180.9 with SMTP id bs9mr4634179icb.0.1326393769260; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.135.3 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:42:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:42:49 +0200 Message-ID: From: George Kontostanos To: FreeBSD Stable , FreeBSD-Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:42:50 -0000 Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting! There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9 and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port rebuild. The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28831 Frankly, I am also confused because I remember a relevant discussion a few months ago in the lists. Traditionally a major RELEASE upgrade requires a full ports rebuild, however this time there is no COMPAT_FREEBSD8 in GENERIC and most upgraded systems seem to be working fine. On the other hand this is stated in UPDATING: 20110828: Bump the shared library version numbers for libraries that do not use symbol versioning, have changed the ABI compared to stable/8 and which shared library version was not bumped. Done as part of 9.0-RELEASE cycle. Your input would be appreciated! Regards, -- George Kontostanos Aicom telecoms ltd