From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Apr 13 13:54:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B952BEFD8 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49198b2w6wz4d3X for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 63FDB2BEFD7; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C622BEFD6 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49198Z2q3jz4d3V; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 03DDsHIT002098 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:54:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it; s=202002; t=1586786060; bh=Svq0kK/EqgjuN/87Q0uO0OHDYGuECV7qwctrsaB8sh4=; h=Subject:From:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=PrIJnNY+h1jgbbC7umgLao352u5QXCVCB6mveUVLyQLmrNoJV+FOY+iWd6FzCSwE0 Z/mv7eJI86K1gsIM4z3LZvoWGJfOwgnlaBjpTOOo7eG4wlcaDwJa1TddlDQPfIz7h7 tzFQmvhF7AKdH9GroCZr7GhD6taU/ALbL8NS0pZc= X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Users of x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-legacy From: Andrea Venturoli To: Niclas Zeising , x11@FreeBSD.org References: <16c93a1a-cc60-b9a5-da48-889f48aa6005@netfence.it> <9352b468-9f09-ad30-0b9e-acd896cadb17@freebsd.org> <0c34355a-9f91-a966-7e46-aefcd2806fbd@netfence.it> <1c29f581-5048-8c1f-195a-6b22f8487163@netfence.it> Message-ID: <64fd0263-3135-b78d-0beb-4f17b57efba0@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:54:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1c29f581-5048-8c1f-195a-6b22f8487163@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49198Z2q3jz4d3V X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfence.it header.s=202002 header.b=PrIJnNY+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.81 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netfence.it:s=202002]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-1.81)[ip: (-8.59), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-4.30), asn: 30722(3.82), country: IT(0.03)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:54:24 -0000 On 2020-04-13 15:41, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Agree on the basic part. > However, the same Wikipedia page says 785G/880G, but code name is RS880 > for both... yes very confusing. As I understand it 785G/880G refers to the whole southbridge, which includes graphics, PCI and other things. Graphics *should* be RS880 in both cases. Of course I might get it all wrong. bye av.