From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 25 11:14:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6357C37BC6F; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:14:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id UAA86902; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:14:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA99073; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:14:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:14:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: clemensF , freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c In-Reply-To: <12209.961944459@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [cred->cr_uid==0] > >this should be more portable and future-save, right? > Isn't there an issue with NFS server side ? There might be. I have not looked at the NFS code. However, offhand, I do not see any reason why this should be the case, except for bugs in the code, given that any requrest with uid 0 should, at the moment, have Super powers anyway. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message