From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Sep 27  9:38:19 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E95A537B424; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from fpscha@localhost)
	by ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA43617;
	Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:38:24 -0300 (ART)
From: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar>
Message-Id: <200009271638.NAA43617@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar>
Subject: Re: Good network monitoring utility
In-Reply-To: <014401c0289d$a7765320$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru> "from Artem Koutchine
 at Sep 27, 2000 08:11:50 pm"
To: Artem Koutchine <matrix@ipform.ru>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:38:24 -0300 (ART)
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@via-net-works.net.ar>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

En un mensaje anterior, Artem Koutchine escribió:
> I have found 'netsaint' in the ports and looked at the demo and it looks
> pretty good,
> has anybody  actually tried it?

netsait 0.0.6 (although still in beta) is pretty good, but it does not
monitor from a security point of view. It uses a 'reachability' point of
view (in answer 'is everything working?' but not 'has anything been
breached?').

Regards.



Fernando P. Schapachnik
Administración de la red
VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A.
fernando@via-net-works.net.ar
(54-11) 4323-3333


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message