From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 24 10:34:31 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB22C16A417 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Received: from aa002msb.fastweb.it (aa002msb.fastweb.it [85.18.95.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B5013C4A5 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Received: from mail.logital.it (85.18.201.99) by aa002msb.fastweb.it (7.3.118.6) id 466578130791815A for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:21:20 +0200 Received: from [192.168.33.30] (85-18-250-113.ip.fastwebnet.it [85.18.250.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.logital.it (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9OALEGO056414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:21:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Message-ID: <471F1C83.5010209@commit.it> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:20:51 +0200 From: Angelo Turetta User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Zander References: <786602c60710210500xd709756x4cb714666a1c39d5@mail.gmail.com> <18203.24753.63146.314861@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <786602c60710210757o29413e79i297f30e639db6a24@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <786602c60710210757o29413e79i297f30e639db6a24@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on mail.logital.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: FreeBSD - Ports Subject: Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:34:31 -0000 Thomas Zander wrote: > There it is: > > http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071021.tar.bz2 May I ask you: if the software is at 1.0.rc2, why the port version is set at 0.99.xx? You might want to make some test on your own, but in my experience using a version like 1.0.r2 is supported by the port subsystem. I mean, if you label a version as 1.0.r2, the final version 1.0 should be considered greater than 1.0.r2 (and so allow users to upgrade automatically). Angelo.