From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 28 12:39:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A34A16A4DF; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1BA43D46; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k6SCdpqe018319; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:39:52 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k6SCdpPN018318; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:39:51 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:39:51 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Andrey Chernov , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060728123950.GE16454@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <200607271908.k6RJ8Los011463@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060727200602.GA99525@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060727200602.GA99525@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/test test.1 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:39:55 -0000 On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:06:02AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 07:08:21PM +0000, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > yar 2006-07-27 19:08:21 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > bin/test test.1 > > Log: > > Document that both sides of -a or -o are always evaluated. This > > "feature" doesn't seem to be in the standards or elsewhere, and > > it is against what we are used to in C and sh(1), so put the > > paragraph under BUGS. > > We should examine what POSIX or POSIX test suits says here, if any. The SUSv3 text says nothing on this. It can be hard to test this because in a traditional system (no filesystem-level audit or whatever,) test(1) operators effectively change nothing--hence the name. The world is changing though. -- Yar