Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:56:14 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org>, "Steven H. Baeighkley" <stevenb@frii.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: **questions** Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release Message-ID: <001201c751a8$50d09130$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> References: <eeef1a4c0702150849q76fa6a4cke5e88477189be093@mail.gmail.com><012a01c75128$4d3a5a40$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645><45D49D5A.8070800@frii.com> <20070215182809.GA41947@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Steven H. Baeighkley" <stevenb@frii.com> Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:28 AM Subject: Re: **questions** Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:50:18AM -0700, Steven H. Baeighkley wrote: > > If bugs is the correct list then that's where we'll send it. However we > > were not initially thinking it was a bug. We were thinking it was a > > configuration error on our part. We certainly weren't expecting kernel > > patches, just advice on where next to proceed. Thanks for the send-pr > > suggestion. We have verbose dmesg logs for all of our testing, I didn't > > want to send them initially because they are large and we have 12 of them. > > bugs isn't correct either, that's only for automated mailing of > problem reports. I'd recommend either freebsd-stable or > freebsd-performance, those are technical lists read by developers. > > Kris > > P.S. I second the recommendation to ignore Ted :-) Oh, your answer is then to just send him to another list? So, I'm wrong for telling him to get out of here and go to send-pr, and your right for telling him to get out of here and go to another mailing list. Uh huh. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001201c751a8$50d09130$3c01a8c0>