From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 29 16:04:56 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B1E16A4F5;
	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:04:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@masm.elcom.ru)
Received: from smtp.elcom.ru (smtp.elcom.ru [84.53.200.28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB7C13C45B;
	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:04:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@masm.elcom.ru)
Received: by smtp.elcom.ru (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id C4CFD3D8706; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:31:05 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from VMHOST (dsl-212-78.elcom.ru [84.53.212.78])
	by smtp.elcom.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA793D868E;
	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:31:05 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:31:12 +0300
From: "Victor M. Blood" <freebsd@masm.elcom.ru>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.80.06) Professional
Organization: Home Programming Inc.
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <844298991.20071029123112@masm.elcom.ru>
To: Darren Reed <darrenr@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <47200F5E.9070104@freebsd.org>
References: <359284519.20071018014832@masm.elcom.ru>
	<200710172357.18221.max@love2party.net>
	<6210619899.20071018020530@masm.elcom.ru>
	<200710180021.39250.max@love2party.net>
	<1564774296.20071018172432@masm.elcom.ru>
	<47200F5E.9070104@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ipfilter cannot be build within because warning's are present
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:04:56 -0000

On 25.10.2007, Darren Reed wrote:
> Please try the attached patch.

Hmm... All patches failed in /sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet

Script started on Mon Oct 29 13:25:23 2007
release# patch=07 -p4 <fr=07=08=1B[K=08=1B[K ip_fi=07l_f=07reebsd.c.=07patc=
h=20

Hmm...  Looks like a context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_fil_freebsd.c       Thu Sep 20 05:51:50 2007

|--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_fil_freebsd.c      Sat Oct 20 22:29:37 2007

--------------------------
Patching file ip_fil_freebsd.c using Plan A...
(Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without
the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
the new style...)
Hunk #1 failed at 345.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_fil_freebsd.c.rej
done
release# patch -p4 <fre=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K ip_po=07ol.c=07.patch=20

Hmm...  Looks like a context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_pool.c      Wed Oct 10 02:45:37 2007

|--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_pool.c     Wed Oct 24 19:59:13 2007

--------------------------
Patching file ip_pool.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 977.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_pool.c.rej
done
release# patch -p4 < ip_pool.c.patch=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[=
K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[Kna=07t.c=07.=07pat=
ch=20

Hmm...  Looks like a context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_nat.c       Tue Oct 16 03:08:10 2007

|--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_nat.c      Sat Oct 20 22:48:19 2007

--------------------------
Patching file ip_nat.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 187.
(Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without
the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
the new style...)
Hunk #2 failed at 817.
Hunk #3 failed at 888.
Hunk #4 failed at 1190.
Hunk #5 failed at 1201.
Hunk #6 failed at 1213.
Hunk #7 failed at 1229.
Hunk #8 failed at 1247.
Hunk #9 failed at 1267.
Hunk #10 failed at 1287.
Hunk #11 failed at 1361.
11 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_nat.c.rej
done
release# patch -p4 < ip_nat.c.patch=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=
=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[Krul=07es.h=07=07.patch=20

Hmm...  Looks like a context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_state.c     Tue Oct 16 02:33:23 2007

|--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_state.c    Sat Oct 20 22:47:57 2007

--------------------------
Patching file ip_state.c using Plan A...
(Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without
the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
the new style...)
Hunk #1 failed at 653.
Hunk #2 failed at 672.
Hunk #3 failed at 683.
3 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_state.c.rej
done
release# exit

exit

Script done on Mon Oct 29 13:26:42 2007

--=20
With all regards, Victor M. Blood.   mailto: freebsd@masm.elcom.ru
FTN: 2:5024/1.95@Fidonet.org, ICQ#3567656