Date: Sun, 25 May 1997 11:16:45 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: jdp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <19970525111645.27901@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970516172322.26498A-100000@nexis.net>; from James FitzGibbon on Fri, May 16, 1997 at 05:30:13PM -0400 References: <199705162123.OAA06030@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970516172322.26498A-100000@nexis.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 16, 1997 at 05:30:13PM -0400, James FitzGibbon wrote: > That way people who just sup ports and never get updates to stuff in > /usr/share/mk will not be able to make new ports, but will be told "Time > to Upgrade!" I think I've mentioned this before, but I don't remember the outcome. Isn't there *some* why to include "src/share/mk/bsd.port.mk,v" in the ports-all CVSup collection. I really would like to SUP the most current bsd.port.mk. I'd be willing to have to take all of src/share/mk (if say src-share-mk were created), but no more of src/share. I think CVSup is the greatest thing since sliced FreeBSD :-) I think it would be really great if there were a way to CVSup finer grainularity. I think the more people we get weekend hacking FreeBSD the more people will only be interested in small parts of the source tree. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970525111645.27901>