Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:08:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221626] databases/mariadb101-server 10.1.26 client build USES both libedit and readline Message-ID: <bug-221626-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221626 Bug ID: 221626 Summary: databases/mariadb101-server 10.1.26 client build USES both libedit and readline Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: brnrd@freebsd.org Reporter: neil@darlow.co.uk Assignee: brnrd@freebsd.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(brnrd@freebsd.org) Just updated to FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE and as part of the process updated mariadb101-client to 10.1.26 Previously my system only relied on readline but this update installed libe= dit as an additional dependency. Looking at databases/mariadb101-server/Makefile there is an unconditional U= SES of libedit for both server and client cases but later there is a conditional USES of readline for the client case. I know that the build process will have rules for selecting one only of the= two available libraries but it seems unnecessary to pull in a redundant depende= ncy. Perhaps, like other ports, some OPTIONS could be provided to specify which = of libedit or readline is to be used. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-221626-13>