From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 06:03:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7697F1065743 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from TERRY@tmk.com) Received: from server.tmk.com (server.tmk.com [204.141.35.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E878FC16 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tmk.com by tmk.com (PMDF V6.4 #37010) id <01NRFO62ID6O002NBB@tmk.com> for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:43:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:35:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Terry Kennedy To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-id: <01NRFOGNZW90002NBB@tmk.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Subject: Re: ZFS v28 is ready for wider testing. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:03:15 -0000 First, thanks for the immense amount of effort you've obviously put into this! I'm running 8-STABLE and would love to give this a good workout here. I currently have 3 test boxes w/ 32TB on each, currently runnihg the ZFS 14 that comes w/ RELENG_8. Dual E5520 CPU's and 48GB of RAM on each as well. The OS is on a separate set of gmirror'd UFS drives, so the lack of boot support won't be a problem. I saw that another poster said there were only a small percentage of patch files that didn't apply on his system (which was RELENG_8 with some other ZFS changes, IIRC). If someone can put together a v28 patchset against 8_STABLE, I promise to give it a good workout. Also, if that happens, would it be useful to have a list of the "ex- pected" LOR's in case testing on 8 turns up some that you haven't seen before? Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com terry@tmk.com New York, NY USA