From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 29 22:35:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19611A0BF27; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markhamb@corp.ssimicro.com) Received: from smail.ssimicro.com (smail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smail.ssimicro.com", Issuer "test CA 1" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89AE310E6; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markhamb@corp.ssimicro.com) Received: from markham.ssimicro.com (markham.ssimicro.com [64.247.130.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smail.ssimicro.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t8TMLcUi014934 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:21:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from markhamb@corp.ssimicro.com) Subject: Re: No pkg-1.6 on FreeBSD 10.2? To: Baptiste Daroussin , Maxim V Filimonov References: <3701506.t2rT67cocA@thinkpad> <20150927080439.GW16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: markham breitbach Message-ID: <560B0F63.9030808@corp.ssimicro.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:23:31 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150927080439.GW16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:35:22 -0000 On 2015-09-27 2:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 05:21:49AM +0300, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: >> Hi, I'm using two versions of FreeBSD: 10.1 on my virtual server and 10.2 on >> my home machines. On 10.1, pkg has updated to 1.6, but not on 10.2. Is this >> the normal behavior? Is it going to update soon? > Since 10.2 the releases now uses quarterly packages which are stable for 3 > month. > > pkg 1.6 will be part of the next quarterly which will appear at the beginning of > October. > > Best regards, > Bapt How do I work around this? I now have ports telling me "pkg(8) must be version 1.6.0 or greater" but I can't upgrade pkg for another 3 days or more? -M