Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 03:01:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237634] security/py-bro-pkg: Rename (move) to security/py-zeek-pkg Message-ID: <bug-237634-7788-OoYPsN9fop@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237634-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237634-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237634 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(mshirk | |@daemon-security.com) CC| |mshirk@daemon-security.com, | |python@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |needs-patch, needs-qa Status|New |Open Summary|[PORT DEPRECATED] |security/py-bro-pkg: Rename |security/py-bro-pkg and |(move) to |[NEW PORT] |security/py-zeek-pkg |security/py-zeek-pkg | --- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- @Shirkdog Thank you for the issue detail. This should likely take the form of a "port move" via 'svn mv', then updati= ng the target to be the new name, instead of a deprecation && new port. Please: - Include all changes for the above move as an svn diff against /usr/ports instead of in comments, including an entry in MOVED for the port rename - Use the maintainer-approval attachment flag (set to +), to signify mainta= iner approval. Attachment -> Details -> maintainer-approval [+]. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237634-7788-OoYPsN9fop>