Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:22:01 +0200 From: Dirk GOUDERS <gouders@et.bocholt.fh-ge.de> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Include files that depend on include files Message-ID: <200508092222.j79MM1DR013799@sora.hank.home> In-Reply-To: Message from Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> of "Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:01:21 PDT." <20050809220121.GB15004@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is intentational. We try to avoid having headers bring in more > then absolutly required when included. I'm not sure what your second > question means. With my second question I wanted to ask if this intention is only for kernel level code or a general one. I am asking this, because somewhen in a project that I was not actually participating in I heard or read a rule that roughly said: "all include files have to include all files they depend on and compile cleanly", but that project was on a user space program. Dirk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508092222.j79MM1DR013799>